Nominations #8 And Andrew The Big Sook!

Before I recap the nominations from last night, I just have to comment on the massive whinging that Andrew did after BB made the announcement about the "All male" nomination twist.
For someone who repeatedly says they aren't there to "play the game" and that supposedly he'll be leaving next month to go back to work, he sure kicked up a stink about the nominations process, more so than ANY other male HM.
Andrew spent the whole of Sunday night and all of Monday, complaining to anyone and everyone about how "unfair" and "unjust" BB was. He arced up so badly, that he even tried to convince the other boys not to talk to the intruders and even refused to eat dinner with them last night!
What a fucking cry baby!
I could not get over how immature and whiny he was.
He used the old Emma ploy of denial but starting every whiny sentence with, "I don't really care but....." and "I don't give a shit, it's only a game but......" and "It doesn't really matter but......" Before launching into various tirades about the unjust twist.
I wasn't surprised that BB didn't show the footage of him and then Billy going to the diary room on Sunday night to argue the point with BB, or the footage of him claiming it was discrimination.
He said, "If this happened on the outside, It wouldn't be tolerated, It's crap, it's not fair, but I don't give a shit but it's wrong".
Oh methinks you give a shit alright.
Andrew- "You can disagree to the ends of the earth, we're all (the boys) being disadvantaged. No one wants to go, but if I go next week I'll be stocked, BUT, it doesn't sit well with me, I couldn't give a crap, I just don't understand BB and why he would do this. It's just wrong"

Oh BOO- FUCKING-HOO! Get over yourself you whiny, sooky, big girls blouse!
firstly, he's continually contradicting himself and making no bloody sense what so ever, and secondly, the other boys sucked it up, why couldn't he? I'll tell you why. Because King Andrew suddenly had all power stripped from him.
He didn't have the little FNL twist to save him, he couldn't rely on his friendships (alliances) to save him and he felt completely at the mercy of the intruders, and now the voting public.
He's pretty confident with his position in the house. He knows that he's the leader and the house flows the way he wants it to. NOW, he's cast aloft in this BB sea and there is nothing to hang on to and he doesn't like it one bit.

How churlish and immature of him when he called all the boys over on to one side of the lounge and said, albeit in a joking manner, "Lets not talk to the girls anymore", and spoke about division and segregation, "If BB wants segregation, lets give it to him".
I think it was a very symbolic gesture and one to show the others that he STILL had dominance in the house, getting the boys to follow his lead.
He then switched beds so that he could be on the "boys side" of the room, leaving poor Zac feeling more unwelcome than ever. Again, he was separating himself from the intruders and perpetuating the "divide".

FFS, Andrew, GROW UP!!
I'm prepared to spend an absolute shit load on voting this week, just to get his smug, self satisfied arse out of that house. I've seen enough of his arrogance, and I'm sick of him being the self appointed policeman of BB. He's a control freak and he needs to go. Who's with me???

Now, to nominations!

Aleisha
2 points: Thomas. She said he had been very opinionated and two-faced in his leadership the week before. She claimed he was going under the radar by backing down on his stances.
1 point: Travis. Aleisha said Travis was “just awesome and Australia would think the same thing.” She said he was the “most competition in the House” and she was nominating him strategically because he threatened her chance to win BB.

I'm impressed with the way Aleisha articulates her nominations. BB rarely has a problem with her, and she does make a lot of sense in her nominations. She's not as ditzy as she looks.
Jamie
2 points: Billy. Jamie said he was a threat in the House, as he was a leader that people respected, could win FNL and had an “obvious alliance” with Aleisha. “People listen to him more than they listen to me,” he claimed.
1 point: Joel. “Joel has never been nominated by the group, only by people using the twist. And he’s obviously liked on the outside because he’s dodged three bullets. He’s obviously a threat to winning the game.”

Jamie, he's only dodged TWO bullets, but you're pretty spot on with your noms anyway.
Thomas
2 points: Andrew. “I’m nominating strategically because I think he’s a threat at Friday Night Games and the power that comes with that is formidable. I think he’s a huge likelihood to win the whole thing.” Thomas admitted Andrew was a better leader than him and had a good personality.
1 point: Travis. Thomas said he was a good FNL competitor, a “straight-up, good Aussie bloke” that represented everything that was good about Australia. He said Travis’s likeability and happiness with his existing life was what made him a threat.

For the first time ever, BB had no problems with the way Thomas nominated. Good work numbnuts, it only took you two months to figure out how to nominate properly. D'uh!
Zoran
2 points: Andrew. “On Friday Night Games, I think he’s my biggest competition.” Zoran said Andrew had a lot of influence in the House because of that. He added that Andrew walked around like one of “the leaders” in the House.
1 point: Billy. “Billy is the other person that I think could make it to the end of this.” Zoran said Billy was a good guy that could win BB.

How is Zoran still in the house? And can anyone understand a single word he says? He slurs like a stroke victim on crack.

Andrew
2 points: Jamie. He said Jamie was the guy in the House he got along with the least. He said he found it hard to bond with Jamie.
1 point: Thomas. He said Thomas’ behaviour during the task revealed there was more to him than he was letting on. Andrew added that Thomas was deliberately altering his behaviour to try to be as quiet as he could and “love everyone” in the House. “He does it to remain unnoticed,” claimed Andrew.

Does it not strike anyone else as odd that Andrew has taken both Thomas and Jamie into the rewards room? He's very strategic and playing the game harder than anyone else in the house.

Joel
2 points: Jamie. Joel said he didn’t get along with Jamie and his formulas and judging of people made him feel uneasy.
1 point: Billy. Joel said it was a strategic move, but his relationship with Aleisha made Billy a threat to him. Joel added that Billy had never been up for nomination, which also made him a threat.

Another one who's playing the game very hard, but not so much for the financial rewards. Joel has made it very clear that he wants a job in showbiz and you only have to witness his interactions with Gretel to prove this. He's instantly "ON" when she comes on screen or when he's aware that the camera's are directly on him.

Travis
2 points: Jamie. “He’s a little bit lazy at times … he doesn’t really pull his weight around the House.” Travis said the same people always chipped in and Jamie had previously lost the HMs the gym because of his laziness when it came to cleaning.
1 point: Using his traditional rocks as props, Travis said, “1 point, Big Rock - Thomas.” Travis claimed Thomas was lazy too. “He’s like the case of the disappearing rock. … The only weights he’s pulling in the joint are the ones he’s doing to pull up his muscles.”

Now, this really grinds my gears. Travis NEVER nominates properly and he is rarely, if ever, pulled up about it. BB has this guy pegged for a win, and is doing anything to make that ride smoother.

Billy
2 points: Zoran. “Zoran’s personality at times is loud, outspoken and impatient.” Billy gave the example of food rationing last week and said that Zoran tried to take power when it was Billy’s role as Enforcer to control things.
1 point: Travis. Billy said he was loved by all, was an all-rounder and was a threat because of it.

If he doesn't get evicted along with Andrew this week, I may have to parachute myself in there and kick his scrawny arse. He has NO right to be there! Gah!

Daniela
2 points: Andrew. “That’s based on personality. I think he has a pack mentality.” Daniela said Andrew made it difficult for her to offer up her opinions because Andrew only cared about what a few people thought, not everyone.
1 point: Joel. “Based on under the radar.” Daniela said Joel laid low and slipped in the background, adding that he always tried to “go with the flow.”

Daniela is craving power in the house and Andrew/Billy are the only two hm's in her way. I'm really surprised she didn't throw a point Billy's way.

After all HMs had nominated, Andrew, Jamie, Billy and Thomas found themselves up for Eviction. However, after Jamie exercised the ever important "twist", in which he saved himself, he then put Joel up in his place.

I implore you! People who vote, please, PLEASE, get rid of Blandrew and Billy this week!